Tuesday, 6 December 2011

Look at this poster of the other side of the coin what does it mean?


 I can't even begin to describe how fallacious this poster is. Take away all the spoons (representing children) except maybe two or even one, kakarampot pa rin ang kanin sa plato. RH Now? Why not JOBS NOW? or EDUCATION NOW? 

And if you think deeper, there slogan also describes the situation of the country if RH is implemented: panandaliang sarap, pangmatagalang hirap.

Sinong Kumain?


https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=275102095857147&set=a.156840347683323.33484.155899564444068&type=3&theater

Monday, 5 December 2011

US bankrolling RH bill with up to P50M, says lawmaker




The oldest lawmaker in Congress has accused his colleagues of being bankrolled by a huge United States lobby in pushing for the adoption of a population control measure in Congress.

The privilege speech of Cebu Representative Pablo Garcia, 86, in which he claimed the existence of a P20 million to P50 million lobby fund for the passage of the reproductive health (RH) bill had prompted one of its proponents, Bayan Muna party-list Representative Teodoro Casiño, to ask whether the US government was indeed meddling in Philippine affairs.

“I think Congressman Garcia’s accusations are too serious to be ignored and we should look at this closely,” said Casiño in a phone interview.

Garcia said the US lobby’s main vehicle in Congress was the Philippine Legislators Committee on Population and Development led by Minority Leader Edcel Lagman.

“This committee is funded and maintained by foreign agencies and institutions in the service of a foreign power. This committee receives P20 million to P50 million a year from its foreign benefactors such as Usaid, Ford Foundation, Packard Foundation, United Nations Fund on Population and other institutions engaged in world population control.

“For several years and until 2009, this committee held office in the Batasan complex, whether in the north wing or south wing. Now it is holding office somewhere else after its presence in the Batasan complex was denounced by a member of the House on the floor,” said Garcia.

Garcia described the panel as the “unelected de facto committee on population.”

Some of the efforts of the US lobby to rush passage of the RH bill, he said, included referring the measure to the House committee on population and family relations instead of the committee on health (Garcia said the bill was not primarily about population); letting Lagman instead of the committee chairman, Biliran Representative Rogelio Espina sponsor the bill, and allowing the sponsors to take first crack at the floor debates on the bill.

Lagman did not return the Inquirer’s calls or text messages.

In his privilege speech last week, Garcia said he wanted to speak out against the “conduct of some of our colleagues that in my judgment raises questions of potential conflict of interest or the possible transgression of the boundaries of appropriate ethical conduct.”

Garcia said the United States was working to “seduce, manipulate or coerce” the state into passing the RH bill, or House Bill No. 4244, so that not even leftist and hyper-nationalist groups know that they had aligned themselves to the interest of a foreign power.

Garcia said the Philippines was only one of 13 countries that the US had targeted for “aggressive and coercive population control” using millions of dollars “ostensibly as benevolent funding assistance but actually in pursuit of its own global population-control strategy.”

House majority not confident of RH vote this year



The House majority bloc remains wary of putting the reproductive health (RH) bill to a vote because opposing forces have at least 70 members who could derail the population control measure on the floor.
“We do not expect that this will be passed on second reading this year. I’m just being honest,” said House Majority Leader Neptali Gonzales II amid optimism among proponents that the RH bill would be set for voting before the end of this year.
At the Ugnayan sa Batasan forum, Gonzales said that the earliest that the House would vote on the RH bill would be next year when the battle lines between the pros and cons would be much clearer.
“The people who are holding vigil outside should have more food in stock because this will be a long wait. You have to consider the legislative mill, there are at least 20 (lawmakers) scheduled to speak on the bill. People think that after the debates, then that’s it, we have to vote on it. I’m telling you that’s not it,” said Gonzales.
Based on his long experience as a floor leader, Gonzales said the RH bill was among the issues that would be difficult to railroad because there was no clear winner or loser. Nobody knows how many were for or against as everyone has kept their cards close to their chest, he added.
“This is not like the budget where at the end of the day, we have to approve it. My experience as a floor leader tells me that it’s not really time to vote on it,” said Gonzales. “If this was a war, and I am the leader of the group opposing this, give me at least 70 people behind me and this will not be approved. They still have that number.”
Gonzales said that with at least 70 or a quarter of the 287-strong House, the anti-RH forces could still stall the process.
“This is an issue very close to the heart of congressmen because it could spell the difference between victory and defeat locally,” said Gonzales, who noted that a delay would favor the anti-RH bloc since lawmakers were assumed to be more averse to deciding on the measure closer to the 2013 elections.
Iloilo Representative Janette Garin, one of the main proponents of the RH bill, concurred that the majority bloc was faced with a dilemma whether to force the voting on the measures with the outcome a possible 50-50.
“We expect the anti-RH group will again resort to questioning the quorum after a long and dragging debate,” said Garin in a text message.
Garin proposed that all lawmakers be required to be present from the start of session until the end to ensure that the process would be completed. Garin said this could be adopted in the rules of debate that would be finalized after Speaker Feliciano Belmonte Jr. has consulted with the House leaders.